Do people really not see the obvious logical fallacy in the party of Hollywood and high society screeching about the evil rich? So many of those who jumped on the "Occupy" bandwagon are the one percent.
Come on, people. Think.
And they call us the anti-intellectuals.
Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Sunday, April 1, 2012
Thursday, March 8, 2012
You know, Alec Baldwin promised to move if Bush won, and yet, Bush won and Baldwin just... didn't say anything about it again. We can't get rid of him.
Hey, all you RUN FROM THE SCARY GOP liberals, did you know that Steven Chu stated that his goal - not fear or prediction or expectation, not hope or even plan, his goal - is $10 a gallon gas. Ten. That's right, your precious president's Energy Secretary let it slip that the administration's goal is to make it impossible for most Americans to afford to drive a car. Never mind how many people will lose or have to quit their jobs because they can't physically get there anymore. Unemployment will skyrocket, foreclosures and bankruptcies will too, but none of that matters. We're Saving The Environment! Even When It Isn't At Risk! At Your Expense! Whether You Like It Or Not!
If Obama actually cared about creating jobs or reducing energy costs, he wouldn't have spent this morning on the phone nagging Democrats not to overturn his refusal to allow construction of the Keystone pipeline. All we needed were four Democrats to find their backbones and we would suddenly have 20,000 shovel-ready jobs on the immediate horizon.
Chu said when specifically asked that no, lowering costs is not the administration's goal. And when asked in his LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME press conference (not coincidentally held on GOP Super Tuesday) if he wanted gas prices to go down, Obama said that of course, any president running for re-election wants prices to go down. HE'S PLAYING YOU, AMERICA, AND YOU AREN'T EVEN MAKING IT HARD FOR HIM.
But if you honestly believe we are better off with Mr. "I'd rather be golfing" Obama and his lovely wife Ms. "$10 million plus (and counting!) in taxpayer funded vacations" Michelle, then please. Move to Canada when the Republican wins in November. The fewer socialists we have to deal with in our democratic republic, the better.
Hey, all you RUN FROM THE SCARY GOP liberals, did you know that Steven Chu stated that his goal - not fear or prediction or expectation, not hope or even plan, his goal - is $10 a gallon gas. Ten. That's right, your precious president's Energy Secretary let it slip that the administration's goal is to make it impossible for most Americans to afford to drive a car. Never mind how many people will lose or have to quit their jobs because they can't physically get there anymore. Unemployment will skyrocket, foreclosures and bankruptcies will too, but none of that matters. We're Saving The Environment! Even When It Isn't At Risk! At Your Expense! Whether You Like It Or Not!
If Obama actually cared about creating jobs or reducing energy costs, he wouldn't have spent this morning on the phone nagging Democrats not to overturn his refusal to allow construction of the Keystone pipeline. All we needed were four Democrats to find their backbones and we would suddenly have 20,000 shovel-ready jobs on the immediate horizon.
Chu said when specifically asked that no, lowering costs is not the administration's goal. And when asked in his LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME press conference (not coincidentally held on GOP Super Tuesday) if he wanted gas prices to go down, Obama said that of course, any president running for re-election wants prices to go down. HE'S PLAYING YOU, AMERICA, AND YOU AREN'T EVEN MAKING IT HARD FOR HIM.
But if you honestly believe we are better off with Mr. "I'd rather be golfing" Obama and his lovely wife Ms. "$10 million plus (and counting!) in taxpayer funded vacations" Michelle, then please. Move to Canada when the Republican wins in November. The fewer socialists we have to deal with in our democratic republic, the better.
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Thursday, November 24, 2011
This is an extension of the last post, I suppose, although I certainly didn't intend it to be when I decided to ramble a little.
I am realizing more and more that I do not mean as much, matter as much, to some people as I think I should, or thought I did. I suppose that's a risk one runs with online friendships, especially when one doesn't really know how to interact with people and never really knows what to say. I thought it would be easier for some reason to not have to interact in person. Sometimes it is. Especially when things remain trivial and superficial. But I have a tendency to imagine connections that just aren't there.
For the most part it's nothing big, and I'm sure those in question don't realize how I feel. Mostly because of that bottom line. I'm a casual friend at best, and it doesn't seem to occur to them to think of me otherwise. And let's be honest - I am incapable of trusting them, of really letting them in, so it is probably, on the whole, for the best.
I am realizing more and more that I do not mean as much, matter as much, to some people as I think I should, or thought I did. I suppose that's a risk one runs with online friendships, especially when one doesn't really know how to interact with people and never really knows what to say. I thought it would be easier for some reason to not have to interact in person. Sometimes it is. Especially when things remain trivial and superficial. But I have a tendency to imagine connections that just aren't there.
For the most part it's nothing big, and I'm sure those in question don't realize how I feel. Mostly because of that bottom line. I'm a casual friend at best, and it doesn't seem to occur to them to think of me otherwise. And let's be honest - I am incapable of trusting them, of really letting them in, so it is probably, on the whole, for the best.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)