Do people really not see the obvious logical fallacy in the party of Hollywood and high society screeching about the evil rich? So many of those who jumped on the "Occupy" bandwagon are the one percent.

Come on, people. Think.

And they call us the anti-intellectuals.

You know, Alec Baldwin promised to move if Bush won, and yet, Bush won and Baldwin just... didn't say anything about it again. We can't get rid of him.

Hey, all you RUN FROM THE SCARY GOP liberals, did you know that Steven Chu stated that his goal - not fear or prediction or expectation, not hope or even plan, his goal - is $10 a gallon gas. Ten. That's right, your precious president's Energy Secretary let it slip that the administration's goal is to make it impossible for most Americans to afford to drive a car. Never mind how many people will lose or have to quit their jobs because they can't physically get there anymore. Unemployment will skyrocket, foreclosures and bankruptcies will too, but none of that matters. We're Saving The Environment! Even When It Isn't At Risk! At Your Expense! Whether You Like It Or Not!

If Obama actually cared about creating jobs or reducing energy costs, he wouldn't have spent this morning on the phone nagging Democrats not to overturn his refusal to allow construction of the Keystone pipeline. All we needed were four Democrats to find their backbones and we would suddenly have 20,000 shovel-ready jobs on the immediate horizon.

Chu said when specifically asked that no, lowering costs is not the administration's goal. And when asked in his LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME press conference (not coincidentally held on GOP Super Tuesday) if he wanted gas prices to go down, Obama said that of course, any president running for re-election wants prices to go down. HE'S PLAYING YOU, AMERICA, AND YOU AREN'T EVEN MAKING IT HARD FOR HIM.

But if you honestly believe we are better off with Mr. "I'd rather be golfing" Obama and his lovely wife Ms. "$10 million plus (and counting!) in taxpayer funded vacations" Michelle, then please. Move to Canada when the Republican wins in November. The fewer socialists we have to deal with in our democratic republic, the better.

I'm so disgusted with our president and his party's leaders. In the Twitter townhall, he was asked what he would have done differently to address the recession and he said he would have made more effort to make sure the people understood it would take awhile to fix. Because yeah, that is the problem. The people are so stupid that you weren't able to make them understand your genius plan! It's not because, oh, I don't know - the bigger the government the LOWER the quality of life, the LOWER the effectiveness of its economy, the LOWER the freedom of its people. It's not that you've taxed and regulated businesses to the point that it's more cost-effective to move operations to countries where they can actually run the business. It's not because 51% of people pay NO taxes whatsoever, and the richest people you keep trying to tax find more and more shelters and loopholes the higher their taxes. No. You're denying quantifiable facts, provable facts, and WE are the stupid ones. Newsflash, you dick, your plan ISN'T WORKING.

And Nancy Pelosi! She had the utter gall to smirk at reporters as she drawled that we have reached day 185 of no jobs bill from the GOP controlled House, when we have also reached day EIGHT HUNDRED of no budget proposal whatsoever, which includes time when both the House and Senate were under Democrat control and they could have passed any kind of budget - tax increases and spending increases galore - and FAILED TO DO SO. And when asked recently, Harry Reid said he thought it would IRRESPONSIBLE of the Democrats to propose a budget at this time. Seriously?!? You jump all over Paul Ryan, subject him to any number of personal attacks, accuse him of trying to kill old people because he wants to OH NOES balance the budget and save Medicare, and you fail fail fail EVERY DAY to even propose a budget of your own!

Side note: It is NOT the responsibility of the government to create jobs. That is the responsibility of the private sector, which can actually provide sustainable long-term employment. The GOP understands this. It also understands that it cost $278 million for every job "created" by the stimulus package (which package, incidentally, also paid for the genius program where the US government sold assault weapons to Mexican drug cartels - because nothing could possibly go wrong there, right?). It's actually a good thing the House isn't trying to "create" jobs, Nancy. If you lived in any universe even remotely connected to reality you might understand that.



Never has that been more true. Speaker Boehner said today that we have three problems - a tax problem, a spending problem and a jobs problem. Those three are merely symptoms of our three real problems: a Pelosi problem, a Reid problem and an Obama problem.

Reasons you annoy me, Jim Matheson

In your ads, you make a point of distancing yourself from other Democrats and their policies. But you're still a Democrat. If you don't agree with them or their policies and platforms, why are you still a Democrat?

When a woman, a private citizen, paid for ads for your Republican challenger, you very dismissively waved them off by saying, "it's just the same old same old trying to tie me into the Democratic Party." Um, no. You did that yourself, honey. By, oh, I don't know. Joining the Democratic Party. And then running as a candidate from the Democratic Party.

And one final point, one I stumped my PoliSci professor at Weber with. You constantly say in your ads that you "cross the aisle to do what is right for Utah". If you have to cross the aisle to do what is right for Utah, doesn't that imply that you are on the wrong side of the aisle?

You're a moron. And at the end of the day, you are still a Democrat. You are still a mark in the column that put Nancy Pelosi in power. Stop trying to convince people you aren't one of them, because you are.